In every business transaction, there lies within the possibility that a dispute may arise. Litigation may be the final word on conflict resolution, bringing about the ultimate end to any dispute. While some litigation can be cost-intensive, time-intensive, and painstaking, other cases may be disposed of by depositions or telephone calls. Brown Dunning Walker PC seeks to make the litigation process both effective and cost-efficient.
The three founding partners at Brown Dunning Walker PC , have over 100 years of combined experience handling jury trials for their clients. All three are AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated* and have handled almost every type of dispute. Contact Brown Dunning Walker PC to discuss any complex litigation questions you may have, including those involving:
- Commercial contract disputes
- Arbitration and mediation
- Lender liability
Aggressive, Cost-Effective Representation
The key in undertaking any litigation is to find a lawyer who will represent you aggressively, and who will ensure that no detail is overlooked in making the strongest possible case for your position.
Because litigation is so time and cost intensive, it's important for your business that your strategy includes measures that won't sacrifice the very results you seek. The attorneys at Brown Dunning Walker PC , have strong business acumen, and they work to identify practical, efficient solutions that consider the impact of litigation on your operational capabilities. As a smaller, boutique law firm, they are also able to offer services that are more efficient than could be found at larger firms.
Contact the Law Firm of Brown Dunning Walker PC
For sophisticated, aggressive, and effective legal representation, contact Brown Dunning Walker PC , for your business litigation concerns.
*AV®, BV®, AV Preeminent® and BV Distinguished® are registered certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer-review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings fall into two categories – legal ability and general practice standards.